Home
Mission
Rights and Ethics
Homeless Assistance
Mobile Crisis Team
Child Trauma Services
Psychiatry
- News -
Human Resources
Quality Assurance
Financials
How to Donate to MHS
Directions
Join Our Mailing List
  The mission of MHS is to help people gain control of their lives by forging solutions that resolve mental health crises and end homelessness.  Photograph from The Plain Dealer of 6 November 2007, p. A1.

Healthcare &
Psychology News -
2008
Understanding health.
Designing systems of care.

Healthcare & Psychology News 2006

News

Recent Events

- More -

Healthcare and Psychology News.

14 March 2008

U.S. hospitals treat 308,200 people for violence-related trauma in 2005.  More than 200,000 of these attempted suicide.

Click here to visit this agency's website, in a separate browser windowThe Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, reports that 308,200 people were treated at U.S. hospitals for violence-related trauma in 2005, an increase of 24,000 (8%) since 2002. Hospital visits for violence-related trauma accounted for nearly 1 of 100 non-birth related hospital visits. (See Table one, below.)

Those who attempted suicide accounted for about 66% of the violence-related hospital patients - more than 200,000. (Note: The Office of Applied Studies of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration reported that 1.7 million adults with a major depressive disorder made a suicide attempt in 2003. The AHRQ study described here concerns only those who were treated at a hospital for a suicide attempt or other violence.) Thirty one percent (31%) were victims of assaults, including rape and attempted murder; four percent (4%) were victims of sexual or other abuse. Fifty two percent (52%) of those abused were children.  Females accounted for 64% of hospitalizations related to maltreatment, and 59% of hospitalizations resulting from self-inflicted violence. Males accounted for 82% of hospital visits resulting from assaults. Young adults - those 18 to 44 years of age - comprised 62% of hospital visits resulting from self-inflicted violence, and 68% of assault-related visits.

Annual treatment costs for violence-related hospital visits was $2.3 billion.   Hospitals and taxpayers paid for 50% of all violence-related hospital visits (23% uninsured, and 27% Medicaid), compared with 22% of hospital visits not associated with violence (5% uninsured, and 17% Medicaid).

The study underscores the alarming magnitude of suicidal attempts that result in hospital visits, and the treatment costs of these attempts - more than $1 billion annually. Also notable is that "young adults and children were disproportionately hospitalized for violent traumas." As stated by the study authors, "Nearly three out of every four (74.1 percent) violence-related hospitalizations occurred among patients younger than 45 years old, as compared to 36.6 percent of hospitalizations not associated with violence."

The MHS Mobile Crisis Team assessed 3,367 adults and children in 2007. More than one of three referrals are by or for individuals who are suicidal. Of the 3,065 adults who were assessed, 32% were admitted to inpatient services at the Cleveland campus of Northcoast Behavioral Healthcare System. Many others participated in MHS outpatient crisis and psychiatric services, or were referred to other community mental health centers for treatment.


Number, costs, and other statistics of violence-related and other hospitalizations during 2005, from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HCUP Statistical Brief #48

Principal diagnoses associated with violence-related hospitalizations during 2005, from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HCUP Statistical Brief #48


References


Hospital Treatment Costs for Violence Top $2 Billion Annually. AHRQ News and Numbers, March 13, 2008. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Retrieved from: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/nn/nn031308.htm View the AHRQ news release.

Russo, C.A., Owens, P.L., and Hambrick, M.M. (March 2008). Violence-related stays in U.S. hospitals, 2005. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Statistical Brief #48. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Retrieved from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb48.jsp Read the study, or . download a PDF of the study, using your computer's Adobe Acrobat or similar application.

Suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, major depressive episode, and substance abuse among adults. (2006). The OAS Report, Issue 34, Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.



Healthcare and Psychology News.

28 February 2008

How effective are antidepressant medicines?
How honest are the procedures used to evaluate their effectiveness?

Click here to visit the impressive website of The Economist, in a separate browser window

Results of two recent studies have reached disturbing conclusions about the effectiveness of newer antidepressant medicines, as well as the selection of evidence used in the evaluation of these medicines. The studies were featured in a story in The Economist of 28 February 2008.

Photograph from The Economist of 28 February 2008.

The first study was conducted by Irving Hirsch and his colleagues at the University of Hull in Great Britain, and published in the open-access journal, Public Library of Science (PLoS) Medicine. It was not an original study, but a meta-analysis, in which results from a large number of original studies are converted to a common metric and then examined to determine the magnitiude of the effectiveness of the medicine (or other intervention) being studied.

Biased selection of clinical trials may lead to erroneous estimates of SSRI effectiveness.

What makes the Kirsh study unique is that it included results not only from published studies, but also from studies that had never been published, but had been submitted (as required) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during the time the FDA was being asked to approve the drugs for the treatment of depression. Kirsch and his colleagues obtained these unpublished studies through Freedom of Information Act requests. They limited their analyses to studies of one class of antidepressants, called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), that are believed to help relieve depression by enhancing the amount of the serotonin, a neurotransmitter, available to neurons in the brain. Prozac (fluoxetine) was the first drug of this class to be approved for use as an antidepressant in the U.S. The other SSRIs studied were Effexor (venlafaxine), Serzone (nefazodone), and Paxil (paroxetine).

After analyzing data from all studies (including unpublished studies), the authors concluded that "we find that the overall effect of new-generation antidepressant medications is below recommended criteria for clinical significance. We also find that efficacy reaches clinical significance only in trials involving the most extremely depressed patients, and that this pattern is due to a decrease in the response to placebo rather than an increase in the response to medication." For those with depression of mild to moderate severity, SSRIs were only slightly more effective than placebos, but the difference was so small it wasn't considered clinically significant.


More evidence of the biased selection of clinical trials.

How, then, did SSRIs ever get to be approved for the general treatment of depression if they are effective only for those with severe depression? Dr. Kirsch believes that restricting an analysis to published studies leads to "an exaggerated view of a drug's benefit." Results of a study published this January in the New England Journal of Medicine are consistent with this view, demonstrating that 94% of the published studies, compared with only half of the unpublished studies, showed that the drug being studied was effective. Study authors concluded "We cannot determine whether the bias observed resulted from a failure to submit manuscripts on the part of authors and sponsors, from decisions by journal editors and reviewers not to publish, or both. Selective reporting of clinical trial results may have adverse consequences for researchers, study participants, health care professionals, and patients."

However, SSRIs reduce suicides, especially among the young.

Additional insight into the effects of SSRIs is provided by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), whose researchers examined data on suicidal deaths and the sales of SSRIs in 26 countries during a 25-year time period. They found that

"an increase in SSRI sales of one pill per person per year -- about a 12 percent increase over year 2000 sales levels -- is associated with a decrease in deaths from suicide of about 5 percent. Furthermore, now that SSRIs are off patent, spending an additonal $20,000 on them in the United States could avert one death from suicide; that is a cost per life saved far below the cost of most other public health or regulatory interventions. ... Furthermore, despite clinical evidence that antidepressant use may increase the risk of suicidal behavior in pediatric patients, the authors find that the protective effect of SSRI sales on suicide mortality is largest, both in proportional and absolute terms, for people aged 15-24" (emphasis added).

These results are not necessarily inconsistent with those of the Kirsch study. Clinical trials of the kind reviewed by Kirsch and his colleagues generally evaluate drug effectiveness by looking for changes in quantitative measures of the severity of depression, including patient reports of subjective distress, appetite and sleep disturbance, and functional (social, academic, and occupational) impairment. It is quite possible that those taking antidepressant medicinces felt no relief, and noticed no improvement in their functional status, yet thought about suicide less often, and were lest likely to act on suicidal impulses.

What do these studies tell us?

First, and most important, if you are now in treatment for depression, it is imperative that you discuss any contemplated changes in treatment with your doctor or counselor before making changes. Individuals may (and do) benefit greatly from SSRIs, even though the average response is "below recommended criteria for clinical significance." You may also be taking a combination of medicines, not just a single SSRI, and the effects of combined therapy were not examined in any of these studies. Remember, the information presented here is never meant to serve as medical advice or treatment recommendations. The responsible management of your health requires that you act in honest partnership with your doctors and counselors.

Perhaps the most significant finding to emerge from these studies is that our system for evaluating the effectiveness of drug treatments is flawed, and needs to be changed in a way that promotes the unbiased analysis of all studies, not just those with the desired results.

References


Hope from a pill. Disagreements over whether drugs to combat depression are worth taking. (2008, February 28). The Economist. Retrieved 3 March 2008 from: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10765331  Retrieve the article from Economist.com.

Kirsch, I., Deacon, B.J., Huedo-Medina, T.B., Scoboria, A., Moore, T.J., and Johnson, B.T. (2008). Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: A meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. Public Library of Science, Medicine, 5(2), e45 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045  Read the full article on the PLoS website.

Ludwig, J., Marcotte, D., and Norberg, K. (February 2007). Anti-depressants and suicide. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 12906.  Retrieve the article abstract from the website of the NBER.

Turner, E.H., Matthews, A.M., Linardatos, E., Tell, R.A., and Rosenthal, R. (17 January 2008). Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358, pp. 252-260. Retrieved 3 March 2008 from: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/358/3/252  Retrieve the article from the website of the New England Journal of Medicine.


News of 2008

Events of 2008

Staff Directory

News of 2007

Events of 2007

Key Documents

News of 2006

Events of 2006

Our Service Area

News of 2005

Events of 2005

Outcomes of our Services

News of 2004

Events of 2004

Service Statistics

News of 2003

Events of 2003

Client Characteristics

Understanding Suicide
(An MHS Web Essay)

Healthcare & Psychology
(Recent Developments)

MHS Service Notes
(Our eMail Newsletter)


MHS; 1744 Payne Avenue; Cleveland, Ohio 44114 USA

Click here to open a separate window to the secure website of 
the Network for Good, where you may make a donation, and even set up recurring donations.

Copyright ©
Mental Health Services for Homeless Persons, Inc. (MHS)
1744 Payne Avenue; Cleveland, Ohio 44114 U.S.A.
216-623-6555 - TTY/TDD: 216-623-6540


The URL of this page is
http://www.mhs-inc.org/hc-2004.asp
It was most recently updated on 10 March 2008.
We welcome your comments.
Please write to Joel[at]mhs-inc.org


Explore!   Enter search terms in the text-box below, and click the Search button to find information within the MHS website, or throughout the web.