A Note from Barry Sherman,
ILC Assistant Director and Trainer/Senior Coach
By clicking on the link noted at the bottom of this page, you will be taken to an article written by John Amen (a great friend of the ILC and a person who has passionately explored and delved into his own archetypal journey). In his article, John discusses some of the key theoretical work of Chris Saade (the ILC’s director and senior trainer) related to working with archetypes from an intentional heart-centered perspective. To help you – the reader – more fully understand and appreciate what John is expressing, it will be helpful to consider his article within the larger context of Saade’s approach to archetypal exploration.
An Overview
of the
Intentional
Heart-centered Approach to Archetypes*
as formulated
by
Chris Saade
*The psychology of archetypes
was spearheaded by Carl Jung.
This
overview was written by Chris Saade & Barry Sherman.
©2003,
2006, 2008 Christian Saade
The intentional heart-centered approach to
archetypes is based on the idea of Archetypal Wholeness which involves two
key concepts: 1) Archetypal Maximization and 2) Archetypal
Inversion.
Archetypal Wholeness
In modern times, it has been the pioneering work of Carl Jung that
has helped us understand that all the different archetypal instincts reside
within each and every human being. Of great importance was Jung’s
assertion of the need to embrace the wholeness of our being (i.e.—embracing
those archetypes that are very familiar and prominent in us as well as those that
are unfamiliar and largely undeveloped).
Inspired and informed by Jung’s work, the intentional
heart-centered approach follows in asserting that the process of self
development (and peacemaking) is about striving toward fully embracing of our
humanity. From this heart-centered perspective, it is suggested that we
do great harm to ourselves and each other when we restrict our manner of being
solely to those “dominant” patterns or habits of thought and behavior most
familiar to us. To reject or “exile” any instinctual aspect of our
personhood is to deny ourselves the great birthright of wholeness that
characterizes the very essence of the highly diverse human heart.
Further, to reject or “exile” any instinctual aspect of our humanity is to
create a false polarization within ourselves, where the “dominant” archetypes
are championed and the lower or “exiled” are shunned. Such
polarization fosters an inner stress that is harmful to our personal
well-being and our relationships.
This concept of wholeness is important both individually and
collectively. Because we shun unfamiliar instinctual energies within
ourselves, our tendency is to shun them in others as well. Rejecting what
is unfamiliar to us leads to divisiveness, and ultimately can spiral us into expressions
of emotional (and physical) violence. Thus a commitment toward wholeness
within our own selves is at the same time a commitment toward realizing a
greater possibility of peace and non-violence within our families, communities,
and world. The heart-centered approach to archetypal wholeness
continuously highlights this interrelationship between the micro and the macro,
the personal, and the global.
So, archetypal wholeness is the overarching context of our
discussion. With this in mind, let us explore the different facets of
wholeness (i.e. “maximization” and “inversion”).
Archetypal Maximization: As we said before, each
and all of the archetypal instincts are innate in every person (and wholeness
is the overarching aim) it is important to recognize that in each person some
archetypes will be “dominant” and others will be less prominent (or very low or
“exiled”). Let’s take sixty year old Judy for example.
Throughout the course of her entire life, Judy has been very assertive and has
taken many stands for what she believes in. We could thus say the
archetype of The Warrior is a dominant part of Judy’s nature. On
the other hand, she has never been one to take big risks or try new
things. This is most likely a good indication that the archetype of The
Adventurer is very low (or exiled) within her.
Far from the common notion of “toning down” the most prevalent
aspects of who we are, the idea of archetypal fullness encourages just the
opposite. A primary task of the heart-centered journey is to develop a
very conscious and intentional relationship with our most dominant archetypes
and then maximize their power and impact through ensuring their full expression
in the way we live our day-to-day lives. From this perspective, the
dominant archetypes are those that define the very essence of a person’s authentic
nature. To maximize – to fully express – our most pronounced archetypal
tendencies is to allow the full flourishing of our spirit’s specific and
particular individuality.
Along with developing an intentional relationship with our
dominant archetypes and maximizing their gifts, we go even further toward
archetypal fullness through ennobling. To ennoble our dominant
archetypes – and thus move toward a greater fullness of being – is to recognize
the importance of intentionally investing these instinctual energies in
thoughts, behaviors, and work that serves a greater vision of meaning and
community. Such investment of our dominant archetypal energy takes us
beyond the provincial and ego-bound ways of being that can often characterize
our habitual manner of living. The archetypal instincts that live in us
are so much bigger than us. They can be thought of as the great and epic
powers of the spirit (or life) that have been entrusted to our care.
Thus, to restrict their power to merely helping us get through our lives in a
superficial and individualistic way is to severely diminish their potential for
bringing breakthrough and transformation within our relationships, workplaces,
communities, and world. Put simply, powers within us that are greater
than us are intended to serve life in a way that extends far beyond us.
By ennobling our dominant archetypes we align and harmonize ourselves
with life in a way that allows a more epic expression of our full
humanity.
Archetypal Maximization involves the full affirmation (not
toning down) of our particular natural tendencies through maximizing and
ennobling them to the greatest extent possible. However, maximization
without the invitation of the unfamiliar (or exiled) parts of ourselves can leave
us lopsided and incomplete. This is where the concept of inversionbecomes a vital tool for full self development and relationship
building. In fact, it will be made clear that inversion is an essential
part of empowering, maximizing, and ennobling one’s dominant archetypes.

Before we begin our discussion about Archetypal Inversion, let’s
look at some important definitions.
The
Shadow:
The
shadow is a term used by Carl Jung to describe the part of our personality and
spirit that is not yet perceived by our consciousness. For Jung the
shadow can be a very constructive force as well as a very destructive one. The
key in dealing with our shadow is consciousness.
All archetypes have a gift, a lack, and a deconstructive side. Without a
committed quest for self development we remain unaware of most of our archetypal
energies – in their constructive and deconstructive aspects. Our
awareness of the great gifts of our archetypal energies, as well as their
potential to harm, can remain in the shadow. We progressively retrieve
our instinctual creative strength as we evolve in consciousness and
intentionality. As we gain deeper consciousness, we are able to take
responsibility for their potential to harm. When we become intentional about
our shadows we acquire the ability to differentiate between its creative side
and its deconstructive side. We begin mining the creative side of the shadow
for its rich gifts and amazing aptitude to love and produce. The power of the
creative aspect of the shadow is that which allows us to breakthrough in stuck
places in our loving and in our achieving. As we get to know our particular
archetypal make up we also become aware of its hidden propensity to deconstruct
love, relationship bonds, and dreams. We take responsibility for confronting
the deconstructive aspect of our shadow and for staying clear of its
introjected oppressive ways.
There
are two fundamental aspects of the shadow: the creative shadow and the destructive
shadow, and each of these have two essential components:
The
Creative Shadow:
1)
The inherent lacks in
our personality resulting from our unique creative archetypal make up.
[Referred to as archetypal lacks]
2)
The untapped
creativity that resides in our low or exiled archetypes. [Referred to as the
emerging archetypal shadow]
It
is very important to remember that an archetypal lack or an emerging
archetype is a very creative asset when we relate to it intentionally and
purposefully. However, each of them can drain our relationships and paralyze
our creativity when left in the dark. If we are unconscious of our
creative shadows, we become argumentative and defensive (if not aggressive)
whenever others bring them to our attention.
It is important to
distinguish the creative shadow from the destructive shadow:
The Destructive
Shadow:
1) The destructive
tendency in all archetypal make ups. [Referred to as the destructive
shadow]
2) The vortex of a lack of consciousness
and destructive behavior that emanates from a takeover of the center of our
consciousness by an archetype (even if such a takeover happens when the archetype
is in a functional behavioral routine). [Referred to as a vortex
shadow]
The
archetypal instinct is there to serve the desire or the dream of the center of
our being (the heart). When we are unconscious, a repetitive archetypal
behavior (good or dysfunctional) can take over and blind us to the
longing of our heart, and thus, an archetypal vortex is formed. A vortex
can be obvious or subtle, and in both cases the vortex drains our spirit of its
generative greatness.

Now
that we have distinguished the creative from the destructive shadow, let’s
return to our exploration of the Creative Shadow starting with its first
aspect: Archetypal Lacks.
Archetypal Lacksare the inherent
lacks in our personality resulting from our unique creative archetypal make up.
The
unique archetypal blueprint of our spirit provides us with special and powerful
creative gifts. Yet this same configuration of our dominant archetypes also
deprives us from some creative attributes. Archetypal creativity is possible
only because of what is included and what is excluded in a specific grouping of
dominant archetypes. Gifts are not possible without lacks.
Yet
a common (mistaken) belief is that we could have our archetypal gifts without
the lacks that accompany them. This is not possible since our archetypal lacks
are those which allow our archetypal gifts to arise and flower to their utmost.
It
is important at this point to distinguish an archetypal lack from a lack
resulting from incomplete growth [psychological, ethical or spiritual]. An
archetypal lack is due to the nature of that archetype. A lack due to an
incomplete growth is tied to our level of maturity and is independent from the
structure of the archetype itself. For example, an inability to fully express
one’s self is not an archetypal lack, but rather is a psychological lack.
A tendency to cover or manipulate the truth is not an archetypal lack,
but rather is an ethical lack. A difficulty with focusing on what is
essential is not an archetypal lack, but rather is a spiritual lack.
Our
archetypal lacks deprive us, as well as others, of certain important qualities.
Yet these lacks are essential for the unfolding of our creativity. They provide
us with an inner empty space, or vulnerability, that spurs our specific
archetypal gifts to unfold to the maximum of their potential. Understanding the
inescapable relationship between gifts and lacks is crucial. The study of
people who access their creative genius in any field, be it science, art, or
religion, shows how the ability of these people to express the edge of their
creativity was paired with considerable lacks in other aspects of comprehension
and behavior. Without grasping the mutuality between gifts and lacks we
endanger the well being of our spirit as well as the peaceful harmony in our
relationships. We do this by:
- Feeling ashamed
of our lacks, or at least thinking less of ourselves because of them.
- When others
point to our lacks or complain about them, becoming defensive and use our
energy trying to prove that we do not have these lacks or at least that
the impact of our lacks on others is minimal. Such defensiveness
makes our partners feel unseen in their discomfort and can escalate into
unhealthy tension in our relationships.
- Attempting to
heal our lacks by trying to “fill” these lacks [trying to become without
lacks]. By doing so, we injure our spirit in pursuing an impossible
task that goes against the grain of the creative process.
- Denying our
lacks and therefore undermining the possibility of creative inversion.
- Trying to avoid
thinking about our lacks and missing out on intentionally mining them for
their fertile gifts.
- Shaming others, including
our relationship partners, our children, or co-workers, for the lacks of
their archetypal make up and wishing them to not have lacks (which in
turn, impedes the other’s flow of creativity and love).
How
to approach lacks from an intentional, heart-centered approach:
- Become conscious
of your lacks; claim them with respect and dignity.
- Empathize
generously with those who suffer and complain about your lacks; do not
attempt to belittle or disprove their experience, rather validate it
fully.
- Mine your lacks
for the creativity they paradoxically unleash in you. In other words
allow yourself to be sculpted by your lacks. Your lacks redirect
your generative power to your gifts. Embracing your lacks releases
your energies from the futile attempt to be free of lacks, and rather,
makes these energies available to where you are most productive.
- Invert,
i.e.—call on your low archetypal energies to support your dominant
creative features while remembering that: a) Inversion is essential for
wholeness. b) Inversion can happen only at twenty-five
percent. It cannot make you “lack-free” (the illusion of Godlike
totality). c) The purpose of inversion is to empower your dominant
traits, not to diminish them or replace them.
The
Emerging Archetypal Shadow is the second aspect of the Creative Shadow and is
defined as the part of ourselves that is less developed or undeveloped (our low
or “exiled” archetypes) that is emerging. Archetypal Inversion is
a very powerful tool used to facilitate this process, and it is approached from
two different angles:
Archetypal Inversion as a Continuous Lived Experience: In
speaking about archetypes, Carl Jung said: “The discarded stone becomes the
cornerstone.” By this Jung meant – in essence – that those
parts of our selves – those archetypes – that have been most shunned or pushed
into the shadows are like the missing pieces of a picture-puzzle. To deny
one piece its place as part of the whole is to diminish the effectiveness,
impact and beauty of the entire puzzle’s portrait. So too with us as
human beings; to discard any aspect of our humanity is to diminish our
potential for full effectiveness, full impact and a wholesome expression of our
spirit’s beauty.
When
we invite an archetype that is low or exiled to support our dominant archetypal
structure, we unlock the door for a higher level of creativity. We free our
dominant archetypal structure from the rigidity that can keep it stuck. While
our low and exiled archetypes can be called into action only partially (about
25%), they allow the dominant archetypes to be unleashed to their full
potential, freeing them from the paralyzing effect of uni-dimensionality and
its unhealthy rigidity.
Through inversion as a continuous lived experience, our
task is to flavor our everyday living with archetypal energies that are
unfamiliar (or perhaps even completely foreign to us). The idea of inversion
as a continued lived experience is not about an attempt to replace our
dominant archetypes with those that are undeveloped in us, nor to equalize the
dominant and the undeveloped. From the heart-centered perspective, such
attempts are futile and can even be very damaging to our spirit (as it becomes
a forced attempt to be someone we are not). The heart-centered approach
says: Those archetypal instincts most dominant in us have always been most
dominant in us and will remain most dominant in us. However, through a
continuous process of inversion, we constantly enhance and empower our
effectiveness through flavoring our manner of being with archetypal energies
that are not very developed in us. By doing so and thus establishing a
connection between our most dominant tendencies and least familiar tendencies,
we unleash a power and potential of being that can only be unleashed through
activating (albeit in differing quantities) the full range of archetypal
energies that dwell within us. To use a simple analogy: It’s like an
electrical circuit. For the power and juice to flow, the circuit must be
completed. Both poles must be connected to each other if the electricity
is to flow.
Thus, to summarize it could be said that: Wholeness = Archetypal
Maximization + Archetypal Inversion as a continuous lived experience.
It is important to remember that wholeness is understood as the grand
aim of the self development journey. But how do we strive toward becoming
more and more whole? From the intentional heart-centered perspective,
archetypal maximization [maximizing our dominant archetypes] and archetypal inversion [calling forth our low and exiled archetypes to
support our dominants] are the keys that unlock the doors to wholeness.
Now we will look at a special archetypal mega-tool that allows us
to unlock moments of divisiveness and alienation with our romantic partners and
others.
Archetypal Inversion as a "Moment of Impact": Along
with inversion as a continuous lived experience, there is a special experience
of inversion that can be utilized at particular times when we want to
breakthrough a stuck place or bring powerful impact to a situation.
Different from inversion as a continuous lived experience (that is a way we
aspire to live on a day-to-day basis) inversion as a moment of impact is called
upon in special circumstances. It is an important relationship concept
that the heart-centered approach stresses.
Such special moments of inversion – these moments of impact
– occur through remaining grounded in the values of our dominant
archetypes. At the same time, we intentionally call forth one of our low
or exiled archetypes and make the choice to act from this low/exiled
archetype. By doing so, we quite literally bring a new and fresh
perspective to the situation at hand. Through this special moment of
inversion, we hold back the behavior we would normally choose as a result
of acting from our usual dominant archetypes. And instead, we replace
this familiar manner of behavior with one that is unexpected.
Through such acts of inversion, we create special moments of
impact through building a bridge to the other person. It is a great
tool in all relationships to break the deadlocked places of repetitive
stuck-ness. We all have experienced those times when a relationship
reaches an impasse. We are stuck. We keep proceeding in the same
way and keep getting the same polarized and divisive result. At such
moments, through inversion, we can reach toward the other person. We can
build a bridge. We can transform the situation through choosing a manner
of expression that while unfamiliar and uncomfortable to us, is at the same
time, highly affirming of the other person’s archetypal way of seeing and
relating to the world. During such a moment of impact, through accessing
an unfamiliar part of ourselves, we choose to act and speak in a way that
acknowledges the “otherness” of the one we are relating to. By accessing
an unfamiliar archetype within ourselves, we might witness ourselves speaking
in a way that sounds foreign to us. Yet, at the same time, those words
(while unfamiliar to us) are music to the other person’s ear as they connect
with (and affirm) the archetypal essence of the other person.
Such moments can seem magical. Through acting from one of
our unfamiliar archetypes, we connect with our own “otherness.” And in
turn, this moment of inversion allows us to establish a common ground of
connection with the “other” who sits across from us. This way of impact
inversion is thus considered a moment of “matching” and reconciliation as
it unleashes tremendous possibilities for greater expressions of passion, love,
respect and closeness in our relationships. We match others in ways that
would have been otherwise impossible. We reach toward others and greet
them on their own archetypal soul-turf. We thus build bridges that allow
the energies of heart-full connection to flow unheeded.
In
summary, Inversion breaks the trance of the repetitive and the familiar and…
- HELPS TO FREES
THE LONGING and DESIRES OF THE HEART FROM A STUCK and REPETITIVE PATTERN
THAT BLINDS OUR CONSCIOUSNESS
- SUPPORTS THE
DOMINANT ARCHETYPES IN THEIR GROWTH, EXPANSION, AND GENERATIVITY
- ALLOWS WHAT IS
BEING BORN IN US TO BE WELCOMED BY OTHERS
- HELPS FREE OUR
SOUL PASSION
- SIGNIFICANTLY
ENRICHES OUR RELATIONSHIPS
- SHIFTS OUR
CONSCIOUSNESS TOWARD THE EVOLUTIONARY REALIZATION THAT THE “REJECTED STONE
IS TO BECOME THE CORNERSTONE”- IE THAT WHAT IS REJECTED IN OUR LIFE AND
SOCIETY IS THE KEY TO OUR GREATEST BLESSINGS
- USHERS IN THE
UNFAMILIAR “TWIN” ENERGY [soul expansive versus soul measured]
- SHARPENS THE
CHARISMA OF OUR SPIRIT
- ALLOWS US TO
MOVE FURTHER TOWARD THE WHOLENESS OF OUR BEING
©2006 Christian
Saade and Barry Sherman
The ILC is extremely grateful to John Amen for the time, energy and intelligence he brought to the crafting of his article. Through reading his work, you will gain important information about the idea of Archetypal Inversion as a Moment of Impact. In addition, John’s article will help you engage in a practical process of assessment: you can assess your own archetypal tendencies, as well as the archetypal interplay at work in your intimate relationship.